Overview
- Guidance is provided on how to examine a plan described in Internal
Revenue Code § 403(b)(a) "403(b) plan" ).
- 13.1 defines a 403(b) plan and provides a technical overview and
historical background of 403(b) plans.
- 13.2 discusses the types of employers eligible to maintain a 403(b)
plan.
- 13.3 describes the various funding vehicles for 403(b) plans.
- 13.4 addresses the requirements of salary reduction contributions.
- 13.5 addresses the contribution limits applicable to 403(b) plans.
- 13.6 discusses the applicable nondiscrimination rules.
- 13.7-9 address distributions from a 403(b) plan.
- 13.10 provides a list of possible defects in a 403(b) plan or annuity
contract and resulting tax consequences.
- 13.11 is a glossary of terms.
- These guidelines address only employee plans issues and are intended to
assist the employee plans specialist in examining a plan.
- Given the highly technical requirements of 403(b) plans, the agent may
need to consult the Code and federal Income Tax Regulations for further
development of a particular issue. Accordingly, cites are provided where
appropriate.
- They are designed to help the examiner key in on the issues that should
be raised in a particular plan. It is not expected that every issue raised
in the guidelines will be relevant or should be raised in every examination.
- The techniques identified may be modified based on the actual
examination issues encountered.
- Given the purpose of these guidelines, they cannot be, nor are they
intended to be, a precedential or comprehensive statement of the legal
position of the Service on the issues covered.
- They are not to be relied on or cited as authority by taxpayers.
- They are subject to change in accordance with future developments in the
law.
Technical Overview
- Historical background and regulatory framework of 403(b) plans.
- Section 403(b) was first added to the Code in 1958.
- In 1964, pre-ERISA regulations were issued detailing some of the basic
statutory provisions of § 403(b). These regulations were later amended as
new provisions were added to § 403(b).
- Final regulations were issued under § 415 in 1980.
- In addition, there are recently issued proposed regulations pertaining
to the minimum distribution requirements and final regulations regarding
direct rollovers . (Bold font indicates the term or phrase is
defined in the Glossary). Currently, there are no nondiscrimination
regulations under § 403(b).
General
Requirements
- Dating back to 1958, a 403(b) plan was less in the nature of a plan than
an arrangement under which an employer purchased an individual annuity
contract on behalf of an employee from an insurance company. With the
enactment of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 ("TRA '86" ) and subsequent
legislation, 403(b) plans became more like qualified retirement plans. For the
first time, 403(b) plans or the annuity contracts thereunder must:
- Comply with certain nondiscrimination and coverage rules (including §§
401(a)(4) , 401(m) and 410(b)),
- Ensure that elective deferrals do not exceed the § 402(g) limit,
- Conform to the minimum distribution rules of § 403(b)(10) , and
- Provide a participant with a meaningful opportunity to elect a direct
rollover to another eligible retirement plan .
- 403(b) plans take a wide variety of forms. Even where a 403(b) plan takes
the form of an arrangement rather than a plan, it is nevertheless subject to
all of the requirements of § 403(b).
EXAMPLE 1: The employees of Public School District Y
participate in a 403(b) plan ("Plan" ). Employer's involvement in the Plan
is strictly limited to providing a list of insurance carriers to employees
and executing salary reduction agreements . The Plan is not described
in a basic or summary plan description (SPD).
EXAMPLE 2: Employer is an organization described in §
501(c)(3) and exempt from tax under § 501(a) . Employer maintains a 403(b)
plan for its employees. The 403(b) plan consists of a lengthy plan document,
and employees are informed of plan features through annual SPDs.
(3) A
403(b) plan is always subject to Title II (relating to the Code) but may not
be subject to Title I, the Labor Title of ERISA.
Example 3: Assume the same facts as in Example 1. While
the Plan may not be an "employee benefit plan" under Department of Labor
(DOL) Reg. § 2510.3-2(f), the Plan is nevertheless subject to Code
requirements.

General
Characteristics
- A 403(b) plan is a retirement plan under which a public school or an
organization described under § 501(c)(3) and exempt from tax under § 501(a)
purchases annuity contracts or contributes to custodial accounts
for its employees. It also includes a retirement income account under
which contributions are made by or on behalf of certain ministers. Section
403(b) plans are exempt from the requirements applicable to qualified annuity
plans under § 403(a) and are governed by their own separate requirements under
§ 403(b) . Section 403(b) plans are also known as:
- 403(b) arrangements
- tax-sheltered annuities
- tax-deferred annuities
- annuity contracts
- NOTE:
- Throughout these Guidelines, the term "annuity contracts"
encompasses custodial accounts and retirement income accounts
unless otherwise specified.
- Contributions to a 403(b) plan may consist of
- salary reduction,
- non-salary reduction,
- after-tax employee contributions, or
- some combination of the above.
- In a salary reduction 403(b) plan, an employer gives participants a choice
between receiving an amount in cash or having the employer contribute that
amount to the 403(b) plan.
- Contributions made to a 403(b) plan are generally not includible for
income tax purposes in participants' gross income until distributed, even if
participants had the ability to receive the contributions as taxable wages in
the year of the contributions.
- Earnings on contributions are also tax-deferred until distributed.
- Distributions from a 403(b) plan are taxable under § 72, relating to
annuities.
- Generally, participants are required to pay FICA tax on salary
reduction contributions at the time of contribution. Although there is no
deduction for the employer because it is exempt from income tax, the employer
is responsible for FICA, and income and FICA tax withholding, if applicable.
Keep in mind that certain governmental and church employers and employees may
be exempt from FICA. See §§ 3121(b)(7) and (b)(8).
- The following examples illustrate that 403(b) plans may involve both
employer and individual tax matters.
EXAMPLE 4: Hospital M maintains an annuity plan intended
to be a 403(b) plan ("Plan" ). The Plan provides for non-salary reduction
contributions and is funded through annuity contracts . It is
discovered on examination that the Plan is not a 403(b) plan, with the
result that, for all open years under the statute: (i) the contributions
made to the Plan are includible in the employees' gross income to the extent
they are or become vested, (ii) the employees are responsible for FICA
taxes, (iii) the employer may be responsible for income tax and FICA
withholding, and (iv) Hospital M must pay FICA employment
taxes.
EXAMPLE 5: The same facts as in Example 4, except that
the Plan is a 403(b) plan and it provides both non-salary reduction
and salary reduction contributions . The salary reduction
contributions are subject to FICA tax at the time of contribution.
Hospital M is generally responsible for FICA withholding, and FICA
employment taxes.
Exclusion
Allowance
- The exclusion allowance is integral to a 403(b) plan. The
exclusion allowance permits contributions that would otherwise be
includible in the employee's gross income to be made to a 403(b) plan on a
pre-tax basis and, in addition, it establishes a maximum limit on such
contributions.
- The exclusion allowance is an allowance because it only applies
to employer contributions (including elective deferrals ) made to a
plan which satisfies the requirements of § 403(b).
- Because the exclusion allowance flows from the status of a plan
as a 403(b) , it is available only if all the requirements and conditions of
eligibility under § 403(b) are satisfied.
- The exclusion allowance is a limit because only employer
contributions (including elective deferrals ) made to a 403(b) plan
that are not in excess of the exclusion allowance (or the other
contribution limits to the extent applicable) are excludable from gross
income. See 13.5 for a detailed discussion of the exclusion allowance .

Aggregated Annuity
Contracts
- All annuity contracts (including custodial accounts and
retirement income accounts ) purchased by an employer on behalf of an
employee are treated as a single annuity contract for purposes of
applying the requirements of § 403(b) . See § 403(b)(5).
403(b) and Qualified
Plans
- Although there are many similarities, 403(b) plans differ from qualified
plans in some important respects.
- Only certain types of tax-exempt employers, governments and ministers
may contribute to a 403(b) plan.
- Suitable funding vehicles for a 403(b) plan are limited to
annuity contracts and custodial accounts (and retirement income
accounts for churches).
- The exclusion allowance is unique to 403(b) plans and is a
further limit (in addition to modified §§ 415 and 402(g) limits) on
contributions to a 403(b) plan.
- Salary reduction contributions to a 403(b) plan are subject to
their own special nondiscriminacion rules and not the average deferral
percentage (ADP) test under § 401(k)(3).
- There is no special averaging for lump sum distributions from 403(b)
plans.
- A participant's interest in a 403(b) plan may not be rolled over to a
qualified plan (except in limited instances with respect to an annuity
contract purchased by an Indian tribal government, see 13.9).
- Unlike qualified plans, 403(b) plans are not subject to the requirement of
a definite written program (although Title I requires a written plan document
for certain 403(b) plans). Accordingly, there is no Title II requirement that
a 403(b) plan operate in accordance with is terms. However, certain Code
requirements must be reflected in the underlying annuity contracts or
custodial account agreements. These include the:
- nontransferability requirement for 403(b)(1) annuity contracts under §
401(g)
- direct rollover requirements under Reg. 1.403(b)-2, Q&A 4, (see
13.9)
- 402(g) limit (see 13.5).
Correction Programs
- Three of the Service's correction programs apply to 403(b) plans. These
include the:
- Administrative Policy Regarding Self-Correction (APRSC)
- Tax Sheltered Annuity Voluntary Correction (TVC) program
- Audit CAP for 403(b) Plans.
- These programs are set forth and described in the following revenue
procedures (see also, IRM 7.9, Section 2, EPCRS):
- Rev. Proc. 99-13, 1999-5 I.R.B. 52
- Rev. Proc. 98-22, 1998-12 I.R.B. 11
APRSC
- APRSC is designed to further the Service's voluntary compliance
initiatives by providing a self-correction procedure that applies to 403(b)
plans. In general, under APRSC, an employer (either directly or through the
insurer or custodian) that has established compliance practices and procedures
which are reasonably designed to facilitate overall plan compliance may
correct Operational Failures (as defined in Section 3.05 of Rev. Proc. 99-13)
in its 403(b) plan within two plan years following the plan year of the
failure.
- Eligible employers may also correct insignificant Operational Failures
at any time.
- APRSC permits correction of Operational Failures relating to
contributions in excess of the limitation under § 415 or the maximum
exclusion allowance limit under § 403(b)(2).
- In general, APRSC is not available to correct significant Operational
Failures if either the plan or the employer is Under Examination (within the
meaning of Section 5.06 of Rev. Proc. 98-22).
- In examining a 403(b) plan, it is important to consider whether an
employer has properly self-corrected an Operational Failure.

TVC
- Rev. Proc. 99-13 extended TVC indefinitely and transferred administration
of the TVC Program to the Key District Offices (KDOs) . The TVC Program
generally allows an employer to correct any Operational, Demographic, or
Eligibility Failure (as defined in Section 3 of Rev. Proc. 99-13) in its
403(b) plan that is within the jurisdiction of the EP/EO Division of the KDOs.
- Through TVC, an employer enters into a closing agreement with the Service
which specifies the types of failures, the agreed method of correction, the
applicable fee, and the effect the agreement has on potential tax liability of
participants and the employer.
- TVC is not available if the plan or employer is Under Examination.
Audit CAP
- Audit CAP for 403(b) Plans is available to correct Operational,
Demographic, or Eligibility Failures other than a failure that has been
corrected under APRSC or TVC or is eligible for correction under APRSC. Under
Audit CAP, an employer and the Service enter into a closing agreement
specifying the form of correction and the sanction amount.
Effect of Correction under
EPCRS; Reliance
- Although excise, FICA taxes, and FUTA taxes (and corresponding
withholding) are not waived under the agreement, the Service will not pursue
the income tax liability of participants or income tax withholding obligations
of the employer due to the failures covered by the closing agreement under TVC
or Audit CAP, or failures properly corrected under APRSC. However, correction
of failures may result in income tax and withholding for income tax (e.g., a
distribution of excess deferrals ).
- Excise taxes required to be filed on Form 5330, Return of Initial Excise
Taxes Related to Pension and Profit-Sharing Plans, (other than those arising
under § 4974) should not be resolved as part of the closing agreement document
under TVC or Audit CAP for 403(b) Plans.
- In general, excise tax issues should be resolved by securing a Form 5330
providing for 100% of the tax and interest outstanding (although
recommendation to the Service Center to waive the failure to file and/or
failure to pay penalty under § 6551 is at the discretion of the EP
specialist).
403(b) Filing
Requirements
- With some exceptions, 403(b) plans are required to file the Form 5500,
"Annual Return/Report of Employee Benefit Plan" . The following types of plan
are exempt from filing (see instructions to Form 5500):
- governmental plans
- church plans and
- 403(b) plans that are not "employee benefit plans" under Title I of
ERISA
- In general, a 403(b) plan that provides only salary reduction
contributions and under which the employer is minimally involved in
selecting the funding vehicles is not an employee benefit plan under
Title I. See DOL Reg. 2510.3-2(f).
Examination Steps
- Request all documents pertaining to the 403(b) plan, including, to the
extent applicable:
- the determination of tax exemption,
- basic plan document and amendments thereto,
- SPDs,
- annuity contracts,
- custodial account agreements,
- salary reduction agreements,
- employment contracts and
- other communications with employees.
- NOTE:
- The plan may not have nor does the Code require it to have a basic plan
document. However, faulty plan language may indicate operational defects.
- Regarding APRSC, verify that the method of correction was appropriate and
timely.
- If the employer has a closing agreement through TVC:
- verify that the employer complied with the terms of the agreement and
that correction was properly and timely completed. Because TVC does not
cover the accuracy of specific numbers, verify their accuracy.
- check to see if there are any failures that fall outside of the scope of
the agreement.

Eligibility
- Unlike a qualified plan, only certain tax-exempt employers and certain
ministers are eligible to maintain a 403(b) plan on behalf of eligible
employees. The three key issues here are whether the:
- employer is eligible to maintain a 403(b) plan for participating
employees,
- participants in a 403(b) plan perform services for the employer as
employees, and
- minister is one described in § 414(e)(5)(A).
Eligible Employers
- Not all non-profit or tax-exempt organizations are eligible to maintain a
403(b) plan. There are only four types of tax-exempt employers eligible to
maintain a 403(b) plan:
- A State, a political subdivision of a State, or an agency or
instrumentality of any one or more of these for employees who perform
services for a public education organization described in §
170(b)(1)(A)(ii);
- A non-profit organization described in § 501(c)(3) and exempt from
federal income tax under § 501(a) , or an organization treated as described
in § 501(c)(3);
- A grandfathered Indian tribal government; and
- Beginning in years after December 31, 1996, a minister described in §
414(e)(5)(A).
- A trade association described in § 501(c)(6) and exempt from tax under §
501(a) is not eligible to maintain a 403(b) plan.
- If an employer maintains an annuity plan and is not eligible, the plan
is not a 403(b) plan and the exclusion allowance is inapplicable. For
resulting tax consequences, see §§ 403(c) and 72.
- An ineligible employer may enter into a closing agreement with the
Service pursuant to Rev. Proc. 99-13.
- Situations in which an employer's eligibility varies among taxable years
are discussed in 13.5 (text V.C. below).
Public Education
Organizations
- A state or local government or any agency or instrumentality of one or
more of these is an eligible employer only with respect to employees who
perform services directly or indirectly for an educational organization.
- To be an educational organization, the organization must normally maintain
a regular faculty and curriculum, and normally have a regularly enrolled body
of students in attendance at the place where it regularly carries on
educational activities. Included in this category are:
- public schools
- state colleges
- universities
- Both non-academic staff (e.g., a custodial employee) and faculty may be
covered but elected or appointed officials holding positions in which persons
who are not education professionals may serve are not eligible (e.g., a member
of the school board, university regent or trustee may not be eligible).
EXAMPLE 6: Public High School Y maintains a 403(b) plan
("Plan" ) for its employees. Employee A performs timekeeping and payroll
services for High School Y. A may participate in the Plan because A performs
services for a public educational organization. See Rev. Rul. 72-390, 1972-2
C.B. 227.
EXAMPLE 7: A, a state employee, provides "in-home"
teaching services. A may be covered by a 403(b) plan maintained by A's
employer because A performs services for a public educational
organization.

Organizations Described in
§ 501(c)(3)
- Another type of eligible employer is an organization described in §
501(c)(3) and exempt from federal income tax under § 501(a) ("501(c)(3)
organization" ). A 501(c)(3) organization is defined generally as one
organized and operated exclusively for the following purposes:
- religious
- charitable
- scientific
- public safety testing
- literary or educational
- to encourage national or international amateur sports competition
- for the prevention of cruelty to children or animals
- These organizations include:
- charities,
- social welfare agencies,
- private hospitals and
- health care organizations,
- private schools,
- religious institutions and
- research facilities.
- In order to be recognized as a 501(c)(3) organization, all organizations
except church and related organizations, and other organizations excepted
under § 508, must apply to the Service for a determination letter by filing
Form 1023, "Application for Recognition of Exemption Under Section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code" . See Publication 557, Tax-Exempt Status of
Your Organization ; and also IRM 7.8.1, Exempt Organizations Examination
Guidelines Handbook, Chapter 3.
Additional non-profit websites
that include relevant unbiased information about 401k plans
include: www.403-b.net.
Grandfathered Indian
Tribe
- An Indian tribal government is treated as a State for purposes of § 403(b)
, so an educational organization or a 501(c)(3) organization associated with a
tribal government is always eligible to maintain a 403(b).
- In addition, an Indian tribal government, a subdivision, agency or
instrumentality of an Indian tribal government, or a corporation chartered
under federal, State, or tribal law which is owned in whole or in part by any
of the foregoing is treated as an employer described in section 501(c)(3) with
respect to any annuity contract purchased in a plan year beginning
before January 1, 1995.
§
414(e)(5)(A) Minister
- A self-employed minister may deduct, within the limits of § 404(a)(10) ,
contributions to a retirement income account described in § 403(b)(9).
- Similar deductions may be taken by a minister employed by a non-501(c)(3)
organization with which the minister does not share common religious bonds.
- Beginning January 1, 1998, contributions to a 403(b) plan are not
includible in the gross income of a minister described in (2) above. See §
414(a)(5)(E).
Eligible Employees
- A 403(b) plan can only cover the employees of an eligible employer (with
the exception of ministers described in § 414(e)(5)(A).
- Employee status under § 403(b) is generally determined by employee status
for federal employment tax purposes under common law principles. Whether an
individual is a common law employee or independent contractor is most likely
to arise with professionals such as physicians. See the 20 steps for
determining employee status in Rev. Rul. 87-41, 1987-1 C.B. 296.
- Contributions made on behalf of an individual who is not an employee does
not mean the plan is not a 403(b) , but the exclusion allowance is not
available for the individual.

Examination Steps
- Because the issue of the employer's eligibility is so basic it is easy to
overlook. Check to see whether the employer:
- is a public educational organization,
- has § 501(c)(3) status, or
- has a closing agreement with the Service covering the employer's
ineligibility.
- Be sure to consider the employer's relationship to the participating
employees. If the employer is not eligible, consider a closing agreement under
Audit CAP for 403(b) Plans as provided in Rev. Proc. 99-13.
- If the examination is conducted in connection with an Exempt Organizations
audit, a loss of 501(c)(3) status will automatically cause the plan to fail
the requirements of § 403(b) for any plan year during which the employer was
not eligible. Again, consider a closing agreement under Rev. Proc. 99-13.
- If the examination is not initiated by Exempt Organizations, you may want
to request their assistance on the issue of employer eligibility.
Funding Vehicles
- Amounts contributed to a 403(b) plan may be invested only in certain
funding vehicles . Funding vehicles refer to the type of
investment arrangement for the assets of a 403(b) plan.
- The funding vehicles for 403(b) plans are generally limited to--
- annuity contracts,
- custodial accounts for regulated investment company stock,
- retirement income accounts for churches, or
- any combination of these.
- Custodial accounts and retirement income accounts are
treated as annuity contracts for purposes of the Code. Thus,
custodial accounts and retirement income accounts are generally
subject to the rules applicable to 403(b) annuity contracts (in
addition to their own special requirements). Custodial and
retirement income accounts must satisfy the--
- contribution limits (including §§ 415 and 402(g)),
- nondiscrimination (except those maintained by § 3121(w)(3) churches),
- minimum distribution, and
- direct rollover rules.
Annuity Contracts
- The most common type of funding vehicle for a 403(b) plan is an
annuity contract under § 403(b)(1).
- The annuity contract may be offered only by an insurance company.
- The contract may be owned by the individual, or, in the case of a group
annuity contract , by the employer.
- The annuity may be either variable or guaranteed.
- An annuity contract may contain a vesting schedule for
non-salary reduction contributions , but the vesting schedule must
comply with Title I, the Labor Tide of ERISA, if applicable. However, the
exclusion allowance is available only to vested amounts
contributed during a taxable year or any amounts which become vested in the
taxable year. See 13.5.
- Regulations extend the non-transferability requirement of § 401(g) to
403(b) annuity contracts . Thus, a 403(b) annuity contract must
provide that it is nontransferable. This means that the contract cannot be
sold, assigned, or pledged as security for collateral.
- However, loans may be made from an annuity contract and amounts
held under the contract may be transferred or rolled over to another 403(b)
plan under certain conditions.
- Salary reduction contributions to an annuity contract and
their earnings are subject to certain early distribution restrictions to
ensure that they are used for retirement purposes. See §§ 403(b)(7) and
(b)(11).
- Excess contributions to an annuity contract are not
subject to the excise tax under § 4973. See 13.5 and 13.8.
- An annuity contract may provide life insurance protection as long
as the death benefit is "merely incidental" to the primary purpose of
providing retirement benefits. The rules for determining whether life
insurance is incidental in qualified plans apply also to 403(b) plans.
- Life insurance is incidental if less than 50% of total employer
contributions made on behalf of a participant are used to purchase an
ordinary life insurance contract, or in the case of term or universal life
insurance, no more than 25% of total contributions are used to purchase the
life insurance contract.
- As in qualified plans, the portion of each year's premium representing
the cost of life insurance protection (referred to as "P.S. 58 costs" ) is
includible in gross income and counts toward the employee's basis in the
annuity contract on distribution.
- In addition, a contract on a participant's life must be converted to
cash or an annuity or distributed to the participant at retirement. See Rev.
Rul. 60-84, 1960-1 C.B. 159; Rev. Rul. 66-143, 1966-1 C.B. 79; and Rev. Rul.
68-31, 1968-1 C.B. 151.
- If a plan is structured so that contributions are placed in an employer's
savings account to purchase annuity contracts for employees at
retirement, the plan is not a 403(b) plan. See Rev. Rul. 68-87, 1968-2 C.B.
187, and Rev. Rul. 68-488, 1968-2 C.B. 188.
EXAMPLE 8: Foundation, a 501(c)(3) organization,
maintains an annuity plan intended to be a 403(b) plan ("Plan" ). Foundation
makes both salary reduction and non-salary reduction
contributions to individual investment accounts (not mutual funds) for
each of its employees. Foundation purchases annuity contracts for
employees at their retirement. The arrangement is not a 403(b)
plan.
EXAMPLE 9: Employer is a public education organization
maintaining a plan intended to be a 403(b) plan ("Plan" ). All contributions
under the Plan are invested in life insurance policies for its employees.
Because life insurance must be incidental to the primary purpose of
providing retirement benefits, the Plan is not a 403(b)
plan.

Custodial Accounts
- A custodial account under § 403(b)(7) is treated as an annuity
contract and must satisfy the various requirements of § 403(b). In
addition,
- the assets of a custodial account must be held by a bank or an
approved non-bank trustee or custodian under § 401(f).
- the assets must be invested exclusively in regulated investment company
stock (e.g., mutual funds) and consequently, a custodial account may
not provide life insurance.
- a custodial account may permit loans to participants.
- Both salary and non-salary reduction contributions to a
custodial account are subject to certain early distribution
restrictions.
- Unlike contributions to annuity contracts, excess contributions to
a custodial account are subject to the excise tax under § 4973. See
13.5.3.
Retirement Income
Accounts
- A retirement income account is defined under § 403(b)(9) as a
defined contribution program established and maintained by a church or related
organization.
- A retirement income account may take the form of a defined benefit
plan if it is grandfathered. A defined benefit plan which is established by a
church or a convention or association of churches and is in effect on August
13, 1982, is not treated as failing to satisfy the requirements of § 403(b)
merely because it is a defined benefit arrangement.
- Retirement income accounts are generally subject to the rules and
requirements for annuity contracts .
- The funding vehicles for these accounts are varied, and include
annuity contracts and custodial accounts .
Salary Reduction
Contributions
- 403(b) plans are very commonly funded in whole or in part through
salary reduction contributions . The requirements for salary
reduction and non-salary reduction contributions differ under §
403(b). This section focuses on requirements applicable only to salary
reduction contributions .
- Salary reduction contributions under a 403(b) plan are also subject
to specific requirements such as annual contribution limits, nondiscrimination
rules, and withdrawal restrictions. These requirements are discussed in text
13.5, 13.6, and 13.7.
- Salary reduction contributions are defined as contributions made by
an employer as a result of an agreement with an employee to take a reduction
in salary or forego an increase in salary, bonuses or other wages. Salary
reduction contributions are--
- often referred to as elective deferrals because they overlap with
the definition of elective deferrals under § 402(g). See text 13.5.
- made pursuant to a salary reduction agreement .
- Salary reduction contributions made to a 403(b) plan are similar to
voluntary deferrals under a cash or deferred arrangement described in §
401(k)(a "qualified CODA" ). Many of the same rules applicable to cash or
deferred elections under § 401(k) apply to salary reduction
contributions under a 403(b) plan, including the--
- frequency that an employee is permitted to enter into or modify a
salary reduction agreement ,
- compensation to which an agreement may apply, and
- ability to revoke the agreement.
- A 403(b) plan is neither required to permit, nor precluded from
permitting, an employee to make multiple salary reduction agreements in
a single taxable year. A 403(b) salary reduction agreement applies to
compensation that is not currently available to the employee at the effective
date of the agreement. The salary reduction agreement must be legally
binding.
Special Note: Under prior law, employees were limited to
one salary reduction agreement per taxable year and the agreement
could only apply to amounts not yet earned at the effective date of the
agreement.
- To qualify for the exclusion allowance under § 403(b), the
salary reduction contributions must be in the nature of compensation
(rather than, for example, severance pay) paid by the employer to the
employee.
- Salary reduction contributions are generally treated as employer
contributions (notably for purposes of §§ 403(b), 402(g) and 415) but are
treated as employee contributions for other purposes, including FICA.

Examination Step
- Check sample salary reduction election forms to determine whether the
agreement applies to amounts not yet currently available to the employee at
the time the agreement is effective.
401k Fact:
According to Southern California-based (401k) Enginuity
(www.401kenginuity.com), twenty-year veteran in developing and running 401(k) administration and 401(k) software and recordkeeping systems, the Internet will be the primary delivery system for 401(k)s by 2007. Many web-based 401(k) plans will run on administration and recordkeeping platforms that plan providers will outsource to 401k specialists and 401k Application Service Providers (ASP).
The advantages of web-based online 401(k) plans are obvious to today's workers, and include use conveniences, real-time monitoring and reporting, and instant re-allocation of their retirement assets. The internet has also dramatically reduce the cost of 401(k) plan administration, saving plan sponsor 50% or more in ongoing fees and costs when compared to the older traditional labor-intensive plans. Outsourcing of 401(k) functions by plan providers will extend the trend towards lower cost, high-quality 401(k) products.
401(k) plan providers of all types, financial institutions including banks, insurance companies, brokerages, mutual fund companies, credit unions, and third-party administrators, are now actively outsourcing 401(k) administration and recordkeeping tasks to 401(k) ASPs --- vendors such as 401k Enginuity, whose sole function is to maintain, updated and supervise software-based 401(k) administration and recordkeeping systems on behalf of plan providers. 401(k) ASP vendors are responsible for all routine day-to-day 401(k) recordkeeping and administration functions, thus allowing the plan providers to reduce internal staff, eliminate the expense and complications of licensing, housing and running hardware and 401(k) administration software in-house. Plan providers can refocus and concentrate their efforts on to the needs of their plan sponsors and plan participants, and rely upon the outsourced ASP 401(k) vendor for the recordkeeping and technical "backbone" supporting providers' Internet-based plans. It is inevitable that some of this 401(k) outsourcing to ASPs will include secondary outsourcing of certain non-critical low-level routine day-to-day tasks to non-US locations, where labor costs are less yet the expertise is abundant.
Contribution Limits
- There are three separate yet interrelated limitations on the amount of
contributions to a 403(b) plan which are excludable from gross income. These
limitations are found in:
- § 402(g)
- § 415
- § 403(b)(2)
- Section 402(g) imposes a limit on the annual dollar amount of elective
deferrals made by a participant during the year. Section 402(g) limits the
elective deferrals in a 403(b) plan to:
- $9,500 for years prior to 1998
- $10,000 for 1998.
- All elective deferrals made by a participant to a SEP, CODA, 403(b)
plan, 501(c)(18) plan, and simple retirement account are included in applying
the limit. The limit is designed to restrict the total amount that may be
deferred by a participant on a salary reduction basis.
- Section 415 places an overall limit on the amount of elective and
non-elective contributions that may be made annually on an employee's
behalf to a 403(b) plan during a single limitation year . Section 415
imposes a limit of the lesser of $30,000 or 25% of compensation on the maximum
amount that may be contributed to a 403(b) plan for the year.
- The exclusion allowance under § 403(b)(2) is a cumulative limit
which applies to both elective and non-elective contributions .
Because employees of tax-exempt organizations typically have lower pay,
especially early in their careers, the cumulative formula permits employees to
make up retirement savings in later years. The limitations under §§ 402(g) and
415 are designed to coordinate with the cumulative formula of the exclusion
allowance .
- Under § 414(u) , contributions by an employer or employee pursuant to
veterans' re-employment rights under the Uniform Services Employment and
Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA) , are not treated as contributions
made in the year the contributions are made, but in the year to which they
relate, for purposes of § 402(g), the exclusion allowance , and § 415.
§
402(g) Limit on Elective Deferrals
- For plan years beginning after December 31, 1987, elective
deferrals under a 403(b) plan are subject to the limitation under §
402(g).
- In the absence of the special catch-up election discussed below, the
maximum amount of elective deferrals that may be deferred under a
403(b) plan is $9,500 through 1997.
- Beginning in 1998, the maximum amount is the $7,000 limit under §
402(g)(1) as indexed for COLAs (indexed to $10,000 for 1998 and 1999).
- For purposes of § 403(b), an elective contribution is any
contribution that arises because of an employee's election between current
cash compensation or deferral under the plan.
- An elective deferral is any elective contribution by a
participant made to the following types of plans:
- qualified CODA
- salary reduction simplified employee pension plan ("SARSEP" )
- 501(c)(18) plan
- 403(b) plan
- simple retirement account.
- Elective deferrals are subject to FICA.
- Elective deferrals under a 403(b) plan are employer contributions
which are used to purchase an annuity contract (or made to a
custodial account ) under a salary reduction agreement .
- There are two limits restricting the amount of elective deferrals that may
be made on behalf of a participant:
- a participant limit under § 402(g) and
- a contract limit under § 403(b)(1)(E) . The contract limit has two
components, a form and an operational requirement.
- The § 402(g) participant limit applies to all the elective
deferrals made on behalf of a participant.
Example 10: An employee participating in two salary
reduction 403(b) plans with separate employers must count the elective
deferrals made under both plans in applying the limit. If this employee
also participated in a CODA under § 401(k), or a simple retirement account
under § 408(p), these elective deferrals would also be counted. See §
402(g)(3).
- The contract requirement under § 403(b)(1)(E) applies only to limit
elective deferrals (as defined in (3) above made on behalf of employees
by a single employer. See 13 .5.1.3.
- NOTE:
- Elective deferrals to a 403(b) plan reduce the $7,500 deferral
amount under §§ 457(b) and 457(c)(2) (indexed to $8,000 for 1998 under §
457(e)(15)), and may reduce the amount that can be deferred under § 403(b).
- The effect of § 457(c)(2) is that an individual who defers compensation in
both an eligible section 457 plan ("457 plan" ) and in a 403(b) plan is
limited to a total combined deferral of $8,000 annually (for 1998) if the
individual is to enjoy tax deferral on the combined amounts.
- If the combined deferral exceeds this amount, the amounts are treated as
excesses in the eligible 457 plan and are taxable currently under § 457.
- However, an individual who, although eligible, does not defer any
compensation under the 457 plan in any given year is not subject to the
$8,000 annual limit of § 457(c)(2). Such an individual can defer the full
$10,000 under the 403(b) plan in 1998. The coordination limitation applies
to plans of all employers rather than to each employer.
EXAMPLE 11: X participates in both an eligible 457 plan
and a 403(b) plan maintained by two separate employers, respectively. X
defers the maximum amount of $8,000 under the 457 plan and $2,000 under the
403(b) plan in 1998, for a total of $10,000. X will have an excess
deferral of $2,000 under the 457 plan because of § 457(c)(2). The $2,000
deferred under the 403(b) plan will be applied first against the $8,000
limit of § 457, and the amount deferred under the 457 plan, $8,000, will
then be applied and will exceed the $8,000 limit by
$2,000.

One-Time Irrevocable
Election
- Elective deferrals do not include elective contributions
made pursuant to a one-time irrevocable election that is made at:
- initial eligibility to participate in the salary reduction
agreement , or
- pursuant to certain other one-time irrevocable elections to be specified
in regulations, or
- pre-tax contributions made as a condition of employment.
- If a participant has the right or ability to terminate or modify an
election, the contributions are elective deferrals even if the
participant never exercises this right. The § 402(g) limit affects only
elective deferrals , it does not apply to other kinds of contributions.
Consequently, it is critical to determine which (if any) contributions are
elective deferrals .
EXAMPLE 12: X participates in a 403(b) plan ("Plan" ). In
order to receive employer contributions under the Plan, X is required to
elect to defer 3% of salary in the form of "Mandatory Contributions." X has
the option of revoking this election at any time, although X never
terminates his election. The Mandatory Contributions are elective
deferrals because X's election is revocable. These contributions are
therefore included in applying the § 402(g) limit. They are also subject to
FICA (if applicable).
EXAMPLE 13: Assume the same facts as in Example 12,
except that the Plan further provides that an election to terminate
participation in the Plan is irrevocable. Thus, an employee who terminates
his election will be permanently excluded from participating in the Plan.
Even so, since the election to participate is revocable, the Mandatory
Contributions are elective deferrals under § 402(g) . The
contributions are subject to FICA (if applicable).
- NOTE:
- Example 13 points out that if an employee may terminate his election to
participate in a plan, the election is not considered to be irrevocable.
"Irrevocability" relates to the election to participate rather than an
election to terminate participation in a plan.
Catch-Up Election
- Section 402(g)(8) provides a special election for certain long-term
employees. Under the rule, they may "catch up" on the funding of their
retirement benefit by increasing their elective deferrals over the
$10,000 (for 1998) limit.
- The election is available only to an employee who has completed at least
15 years of service (defined in § 403(b)) with an employer that is
either a(n):
- educational organization
- hospital
- home health service agency
- health and welfare service agency
- church
- related organization.
- Under the election, the annual limitation is increased by the smallest of:
- $3,000,
- $15,000 minus any elective deferrals made by the organization and
previously excluded under the catch-up election, or
- $5,000 times the employee's years of service minus the
elective deferrals made to plans of the organization in prior taxable
years.
- As can be seen from this election, there is a limit on increases under the
election of $15,000, and the annual limit cannot exceed $13,000 for 1998. The
catch-up applies to elective deferrals made by the qualified
organization on behalf of the employee. In theory, an employee who has 15
years of service with another qualified organization could use
the full amount of the catch up election with respect to the new organization.

Contract Limit
- As indicated in text 13.5.1.2, § 402(g) limits all elective
deferrals of a participant, even if the elective deferrals are made
with respect to plans of separate employers. Section 403(b)(1)(E) imposes a
contract requirement which limits the amount of elective deferrals
under annuity contracts purchased by a single employer. A failure to
satisfy this requirement results in the loss of 403(b) status of the
annuity contracts .
Contract Terms
- Under § 403(b)(1)(E) , a contract purchased by an employer must comply
with the requirements of § 401(a)(30).
- Section 401(a)(30) requires a qualified plan to provide that the amount of
elective deferrals under plans of the employer not exceed the limit
under § 402(g). Thus, in order to be a valid contract under § 403(b), the
contract by its terms must preclude the making of excess deferrals .
- Section 403(b) contracts must be amended to reflect the 402(g) limit no
later than the first day of the first plan year beginning on or after January
1, 1998. See the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-188,
sec. 1450(c)(1), and sec. 1465; and Rev. Proc. 97-41.
Operational
Requirement
- Excess deferrals are elective deferrals in excess of the
402(g) limit. If 403(b) contracts purchased by a single employer accept
excess deferrals , 403(b) status is lost unless the excess
deferrals are timely corrected.
- Under Reg. 1.402(g)-1(e), a contract may avoid the loss of 403(b) status
by distributing the excess deferrals plus the earnings thereon by
April 15 of the following taxable year, if the contract so permits.
- The distribution may be made notwithstanding any other provision of law.
- The portion of the distribution attributable to excess deferrals
is taxable in the year of contribution, while the earnings are taxable in
the year of receipt. The issuer must file a Form 1099 indicating the
distribution.
- If a contract loses its status as a 403(b) because of 13.5.1.3.1 or
paragraph (1) above, the exclusion allowance is not available with
respect to the affected annuity contracts (or custodial accounts
) beginning with the taxable year of the violation. Thus, all amounts
contributed to the affected annuity contract or contracts beginning
with the year of the violation are includible in gross income.
- The excess deferrals are taxable again on distribution.
- The employer is responsible for applicable employment taxes and income
tax withholding.
- If excess deferrals are made by the employee to contracts of two
unrelated employers and they are not timely corrected, there is no loss
of 403(b) status of the annuity contracts but the excess is taxed both
in the year contributed and again on distribution.
EXAMPLE 14: Association, a 501(c)(3) organization,
maintains a 403(b) plan ("Plan" ) with a calendar plan year. In 1998, each
of Association's highly compensated employees ("HCEs" ) elects to make
contributions of $30,000 on the mistaken assumption that the contributions
are not elective deferrals limited by § 402(g) . The excess
deferrals of $20,000 ($30,000 - $10,000) are not timely corrected. All
contributions made to the affected annuity contracts in 1998 are
includible in the employees' gross income for taxable year 1998 and are
subject to FICA. In addition, Association is responsible for employment
taxes and withholding. The excess deferrals are taxable again on
distribution.
EXAMPLE 15: The same facts as Example 14, except that
$15,000 of the $30,000 contributed to the Plan in 1998 consists of
non-elective contributions . Even though only one-half of the
contributions are elective, they are still in excess of the § 402(g) limit
for the year, and thus all contributions made to the affected annuity
contracts are includible in gross income for tax year
1998.

Examination Steps
- The first step is to identify the elective deferrals under the
plan(s) of the employer. Consider all contributions made to the plan(s).
- In determining whether contributions are elective deferrals ,
examine the substance of the arrangement. Do not be misled by the labels an
employer attaches to the contributions, such as "employer,""employee" or
"mandatory" contributions.
- In determining whether deferrals are elective or non-elective, you may
want to consider the following, if applicable:
- The operation of the plan -- have any participants revoked their
elections?
- Employment contracts -- is participation in the plan a condition of
employment? If so, the contributions are not elective deferrals .
- All plan documents, including SPDs, funding vehicles , and any
memoranda or other communications to employees, if any.
- In certain cases, it may be appropriate to check for any inconsistencies
in the various documents.
- If there are elective deferrals under the plan, see if the
underlying annuity contracts (including custodial account
agreements ) specifically limit elective deferrals . Also check for
excess deferrals by requesting annual contributions records and/or
salary reduction agreements.
- If the employer has another plan covering the same employees (including a
403(b) plan with elective deferrals , a section 457 plan, or qualified
CODA) , make sure that the combined amount of elective deferrals are
within the 402(g) limit and the 457(c)(2) coordinated limit.
- Check to see if the elective deferrals were reported on the Form
W-2, and on Form 1099-R if distributed.
- If a participant had excess deferrals , determine whether the
excesses were timely and properly corrected.
Section 415 Limit
- Section 415 limits on contributions (hereinafter referred to as 415 limits
or 415 contribution limits) that apply to qualified plans also generally apply
to 403(b) plans. A 403(b) plan is treated as a defined contribution plan for
purposes of the 415 contribution limits. Consequently, in the absence of a
special election, contributions to a 403(b) plan (including salary
reduction contributions and after-tax employee contributions) may not
exceed the lesser of 25% of compensation or $30,000 in the
limitation year (although § 402(g) further limits elective
deferrals to $10,000, as indexed for 1998).
- Unlike the exclusion allowance , the 415 limit applies to
contributions made to a 403(b) plan with respect to the limitation
year regardless of whether they are vested.
- For limitation years beginning before January 1, 2000, the combined
limit under § 415(e) also applies if the 403(b) plan is aggregated with a
defined benefit plan of an employer.
- NOTE:
- For limitation years beginning after December 31, 1999, § 415(e)
is repealed (but see 13.5.3, Exclusion Allowance ).
Special "Catch-Up"
Elections
- Partly to reflect the cumulative nature of the exclusion allowance
, there are also special "Catch-Up" elections under § 415(c)(4) that are
unique to 403(b) plans. As with the special election under § 402(g)(8), only
an employee of one of the following types of entities are eligible to make a
special election (although the employee need not be long term):
- education organization
- hospital
- home health service agency
- health and welfare service agency
- church or a related organization
- A special election is made by filing the individual's income tax return in
a manner consistent with the election.
- Once made, the election is irrevocable. This means that no other special
election may be made for any future year with the same employer (or an
employer that is aggregated under § 415), although a participant may always
rely on the general rule. See Reg. 1.415-6(e).
- NOTE:
- Even when a special election is made, contributions may never
exceed $30,000 (as indexed under § 415(d)) with respect to a single
limitation year .
- Each catch-up election has its own limits. The respective limits under
these elections are described under the following subsections.

(A) Election
Limitation
- The "(A) Election Limitation," under which an employee separating from
service may use the full exclusion allowance up to a maximum of $30,000
in the year of separation without regard to the 25% limitation . For
this purpose, the exclusion allowance must take into account only the
10 years of service (as defined in § 403(b)(2)) ending with the separation
from service. See § 415(c)(4)(A).
(B) Election
Limitation
- The "(B) Election Limitation," under which an employee may defer the
smallest of:
- $4,000 plus 25% of includible compensation ),
- the amount of the exclusion allowance , or
- $15,000. This limit in effect replaces the 25% limit up to a maximum of
$15,000. See § 415(c)(4)(B).
(C) Election
Limitation
- The "(C) Election Limitation," under which an employee may elect to use
the 415 limit rather than the exclusion allowance . See § 415(c)(4)(C).
Alternative
Limitations
- There are also alternative limitations under § 415(c)(7) that are
available in the case of employees of a church or related organization.
- Such employees may elect to substitute the § 415 limit with an annual
limit of $10,000 (even if more than 25% of compensation) up to a total
lifetime limit of $40,000.
- Alternatively, church employees may elect to use the minimum
exclusion allowance under § 403(b)(2)(D).
- Even if the limitation under §§ 403(b)(2) and 415 is $30,000, § 402(g)
further limits elective deferrals to $10,000 as indexed for 1999 (or a
maximum of $10,000 as indexed plus $3,000 if the catch-up limit applies). The
§ 402(g) limit must always be considered in examining a 403(b) plan with
elective deferrals .
- The following example illustrates that even where a special election is
made under § 415, § 402(g) still limits the maximum amount of contributions
that are elective deferrals.
EXAMPLE 16: A public school district contributes $30,000
to a 403(b) plan on behalf of one of its teachers for the 1998 limitation
year , the year of the teacher's separation from service. The entire
contribution is made pursuant to a valid revocable salary reduction
agreement . The teacher has not previously made a special election under
§ 415 and properly elects the special "(A) Election Limitation." The entire
$30,000 is within the exclusion allowance (which takes into account
only the last 10 years) . Nevertheless, because the contributions are
elective deferrals , the maximum amount that may be contributed on an
excludable basis is $10,000 or, if the special election under § 402(g)(8) is
made, $13,000.

Plan Aggregation
- Under § 415, a participant generally is considered to exclusively control
and maintain his own 403(b) plan. Consequently, contributions to a 403(b) plan
are not combined or aggregated with contributions to a qualified plan except
when a participant elects the "(C) Election Limitation" (to substitute the 415
limit for the exclusion allowance ), or controls any employer. In these
situations, the 403(b) plan is treated as a defined contribution plan
maintained by both the employer and the participant.
- If a participant makes the "(C) election," any contributions made on the
participant's behalf to a qualified plan by the employer contributing to the
403(b) plan or an affiliated employer must be aggregated with the
contributions under the 403(b) plan for purposes of applying the limits under
§ 415(c)(1), and § 415(e) if applicable.
- Similarly, where a participant controls any employer (this may be the
employer contributing to the 403(b) plan or another employer) for a
limitation year , the contributions to the 403(b) are combined with
contributions to a qualified plan by the controlled employer or any affiliated
employer under § 415. See Regs. §§ 1.415-7(h) and 1.415-8(d).
- The following example illustrates that an employee who is covered by a
pension plan of the employer may also participate in a 403(b) plan through the
employer without having to aggregate the plans under § 415. Thus, the employer
could contribute non-salary reduction contributions of up to $30,000 to the
403(b) even though the employee has contributions under the qualified plan
which are at the § 415 maximum.
EXAMPLE 17: Employee A is employed by a hospital which is
a 501(c)(3) organization. The hospital contributes to a 403(b) plan on
behalf of A in the limitation year , and A is also a participant in
the hospital's defined contribution plan. A does not elect the "(C) Election
Limitation" and is not in control of the hospital. Because A and not the
hospital is considered to have exclusive control of the contract, the plans
are not aggregated.
EXAMPLE 18: The facts are the same as in Example 17,
except that A makes the "(C) election" for the limitation year . The
403(b) and qualified defined contribution plans are aggregated for purposes
of applying the limit under § 415(c).
EXAMPLE 19: The facts are the same as in Example 17,
except that A is a physician maintaining a private practice in which he is
more than a 50% owner. A is a participant in a defined contribution plan
maintained by his private practice. The defined contribution plan of A's
private practice must be combined with A's 403(b) plan for purposes of
applying the limit under § 415(c) because A controls his private
practice.
Limitation Year
- The limitation year generally is the calendar year unless a
participant elects another 12-month period.
- If a participant is in control of an employer, the limitation year
is the limitation year of the employer.
- Control and affiliation for purposes of this section of the guidelines are
defined under §§ 414(b) , 414(c) and 415(h).
Compensation
- The definition of compensation under § 415 for 403(b) plans is
similar to the definition for qualified plans.
- Compensation under § 415 for 403(b) plans is also similar to
includible compensation under § 403(b)(2) except that the period for
computing § 415 compensation is the limitation year (rather than
the most recent one-year period of service). See 13.5.3, Exclusion
Allowance .
- In addition, includible compensation is computed for each employer,
whereas compensation from a controlled employer maintaining a qualified
plan may be aggregated with compensation from the employer contributing
to the 403(b) plan. See text 13.5.3.
- For years beginning after December 31, 1997, compensation includes
any elective deferral made to a qualified CODA, SARSEP, 501(c)(18)
plan, 403(b) plan, or simple retirement account, or any amount contributed by
the employer at the election of the employee and which is excludable from
gross income under § 125 or 457.

Effect of Contributions in
Excess of § 415 Limit
- Contributions to a 403(b) plan in excess of the § 415 limit have two
effects:
- the excess is includible in the employee's gross income for the tax year
ending with or within the limitation year , and
- the excess reduces the available exclusion allowance in future
years.
- The latter (b.) is accomplished by treating the excess § 415 amounts ("415
amounts" ) as amounts previously excludable (see text 13.5.3) even
though they were includible in gross income. Excess 415 amounts do not cause
the plan or annuity contract to lose its 403(b) status. See §
415(a)(2).
EXAMPLE 20: Foundation is a 501(c)(3) organization which
maintains a 403(b) plan ("Plan" ) for its employees. The gross annual
compensation of each of the HCEs equals $160,000. Contributions to
the Plan on behalf of each of the HCEs equal $37,500 (all are non-salary
reduction ) in limitation year ending December 31, 1998, $7,500
above the allowable 415 limit. The $7,500 excess is includible in the HCEs'
gross income for the 1998 taxable year. In addition, beginning in 1999, the
$7,500 excess reduces the HCEs' available exclusion allowances by
increasing amounts previously excludable .
- NOTE:
- Compensation in Example 20 is limited to $160,000, the §
401(a)(17) cap on annual compensation (as indexed for 1998) that may
be considered for contributions to a plan and for nondiscrimination testing.
See text 13.6.
EXAMPLE 21: Employee A participates in a 403(b) plan
("Plan" ) . A's compensation is $45,000. A has two full years of service
with Charity as of December 31, 1998, the end of the limitation year
. In 1997, Charity started making non-salary reduction contributions
on A's behalf to the Plan. Charity contributed $12,000 in 1997 and $12,000
in 1998 on A's behalf. A's 415 limit for 1997 (and 1998) equals 25% x
compensation or .25 x $45,000, which equals $11,250. The excess 415
amounts are $750 in 1997 and $750 in 1998. A's exclusion allowance in
1997 and 1998 is computed as follows:
- A's exclusion allowance for 1997 is $9,000, calculated as
follows:
20% x includible compensation x years of service
,
minus amounts previously excludable
(.2 x $45,000 x 1) - 0
= $9,000
- A's exclusion allowance for 1998 is $8,250, calculated as
follows:
(.2 x $40,000 x 2) - ($9,000 + $750)
$18,000 - 9,750 =
$8,250.
Of the $12,000 contributed in 1997, only $9,000 is excludable.
The other $3,000 is includible in gross income in 1997. $750 of the $3,000
is in excess of the 415 limit. Because of the 1997 excess 415 amounts, A's
1998 exclusion allowance is reduced from $9,000 to $8,250. $3,750 of
the $12,000 contribution is therefore includible in A's gross income for
1998.
- NOTE:
- The excess amounts in 1997 and 1998 are not added to includible
compensation even though they are in fact includible in gross income.

Correction
- Like qualified plans, excess 415 amounts in 403(b) plans may be corrected
under Reg. 1.415-6(b)(6) to the extent the excess amounts are due to one of
the following:
- the allocation of forfeitures,
- a reasonable error in estimating a participant's compensation,
- a reasonable error in determining total elective deferrals , or
- in certain other limited facts and circumstances as determined by the
Commissioner. See Rev. Proc. 92-93, 1992-2 C.B. 505.
- In the absence of such correction, excess 415 amounts are currently
includible in gross income and reduce the participant's future exclusion
allowances .
EXAMPLE 22: Employer maintains a 403(b) plan ("Plan" )
under which it contributes excess 415 amounts to a custodial account
on Participant A's behalf in limitation year 1998. To the extent the
excess amounts are not properly corrected, the excess amounts are includible
in A's gross income in 1998 and reduce Participant A's exclusion
allowance in future years (by treating these amounts as amounts
previously excludable ) . See also 13.5.4, regarding the § 4973 excise
tax.
Examination Steps
- Check the annual contributions to the 403(b) plan. If the amount deferred
for any employee exceeds $30,000, there may be excess 415 amounts.
- Determine whether a participant in the 403(b) has his or her own practice
(such as a medical clinic or consulting firm) which maintains a Keogh plan.
Contributions under the qualified plan may have to be aggregated with 403(b)
contributions.
- Check plan documents, including the basic plan document and SPDs, as well
as the funding vehicles , to determine whether contributions are
properly limited by § 415. Plan language is not required, however, faulty plan
language may indicate an operational defect.
- If the employer has more than one 403(b) plan, see how the plans
interrelate. If the employer also has a qualified plan, check to see if
combined contributions are within the 415 limit for participants who elected
the "C Election Limitation."
- For further details on the contribution limits, see Publication 571
Tax-Sheltered Annuity Programs for Employees of Public Schools and Certain
Tax-Exempt Organizations.
Exclusion Allowance
- The exclusion allowance is an amount that may be contributed to a
403(b) plan on a pre-tax basis under § 403(b)(2).
- Unlike § 402(g) , the exclusion allowance applies to both
non-elective and elective contributions . The exclusion allowance
applies strictly to vested amounts contributed during a taxable year
or any amounts which become vested in the taxable year. See Example
26 .
- The exclusion allowance is designed to work with § 415, so the
formulas and definitions of these terms under §§ 403(b)(2) and 415
frequently overlap. Contributions in excess of the exclusion
allowance for the year are currently includible in the employee's gross
income in that year. Unlike excess deferrals , contributions in
excess of the exclusion allowance do not result in the contract's
loss of 403(b) status.
- NOTE:
- Contributions to an annuity plan are not covered by the exclusion
allowance if the employer was never eligible to sponsor a 403(b) plan.
If the ineligible plan cannot satisfy the requirements of some other
tax-favored plan (such as a qualified plan) , no exclusion is available and
all amounts contributed to the plan are includible in the employees' gross
income in the taxable year they are or become vested.
Formula
- An employee's exclusion allowance for a taxable year is calculated
as follows:
- Exclusion Allowance = 20% x includible compensation x years of
service - amounts previously excludable from the employee's gross
income.
- NOTE:
- Each element of the formula is discussed in greater detail below,
followed by examples.
- Although contributions are tested on an annual basis, the exclusion
allowance is a cumulative formula.
- EXAMPLE:
- An employer who contributes less than the available exclusion
allowance in Year 1 to purchase an annuity for an employee may
contribute the "unused" amounts in Year 2. Thus, the limit may be greater
than 20% of compensation in any given year (but not more than the 402(g) or
415 limit).
Special NOTE: Remember that the exclusion
allowance is calculated with respect to the taxable years of an
employee.
- Separate exclusion allowances are generally calculated separately with
respect to separate employers. Contributions to 403(b) plans of the same
employer are combined in calculating the exclusion allowance . The
amount of contributions, years of service , and includible
compensation are all calculated for each employer.
- EXCEPTION:
- All years of service as an employee of a church or a related
organization are considered years of service for the same employer
(both for purposes of the exclusion allowance and § 415(c)(4)).
Contributions by church organizations are also considered to be made by the
same employer.

Employer
- The "employer" is generally the common law employer for purposes of
applying the exclusion allowance .
- NOTE:
- The "same desk" rule applies in determining whether there has been a
change in the employer. Cf. Rev. Rul. 79-336.
- EXAMPLE:
- Hospital A maintains a 403(b) plan for its employees and merges with
Hospital B, which also has a 403(b) plan, to form Hospital C. Employees of
Hospitals A and B work at the same location and perform substantially the
same services as they did prior to the merger. Under the "same desk" rule,
employees of Hospital C may determine years of service, includible
compensation , and amounts previously excludable with respect to
service performed for Hospitals A and H, respectively, and Hospital C.
Employees of Hospitals A and B have not separated from service for purposes
of the distribution restrictions. RRP
Special Elections
- An employee on whose behalf a qualified organization purchases a
403(b) annuity contract may elect to calculate his or her exclusion
allowance under § 415(c)(4).
- If this election is made, the limit under § 415 is substituted for the
exclusion allowance .
- There is also a special minimum exclusion allowance equal to the
lesser of $3,000 or includible compensation for employees of a church
or a related organization who have an adjusted gross income of $17,000 or
less.
